Industrials · FY2025 10‑K ↗ RTX · NYSE
RTX Corp
1934 2025
1922 Raytheon Founded
1934 UTC Founded
1941 Radar Leadership
1950 Jet Engine Success
1975 Diversification Strategy
1990 Defense Consolidation
2019 Merger Announcement
2020 Merger Completed, COVID Impact
2022 Military Spending Surge
2023 Name Change to RTX
2024 Compliance Settlements
2025 Strong Revenue Growth
Wikipedia history · XBRL financial data

RTX makes money in two big ways. First, it sells complex hardware: jet engines through Pratt & Whitney, cockpit and cabin systems through Collins Aerospace, and missiles, radars, and air defense systems through its Raytheon division. Second, and more importantly, it keeps making money long after the original sale, because airlines and militaries must continuously buy spare parts, repairs, and maintenance to keep that hardware flying and fighting. A Pratt & Whitney GTF engine powering an Airbus A320neo, or a Patriot missile defense system protecting a NATO ally, creates a long tail of follow-on spending that RTX is often the only supplier licensed to provide. The diagram below traces where the money goes.

How RTX Corporation Makes Money
flowchart LR A["Government Contracts 33.3B of 88.6B revenue"] --> B["Defense Systems Raytheon division"] C["Commercial Aircraft OEMs Boeing Airbus"] --> D["Aerospace Products Collins segment"] E["Airlines & Operators"] --> F["Engine Sales & Services Pratt & Whitney"] B --> G["Product & Service Sales 88.6B total revenue"] D --> G F --> G G --> H["Operating Cash Flow 10.6B annually"] H --> I["R&D Investment Engines platforms systems"] I --> B I --> D I --> F H --> J["Backlog Growth 268B at end 2025"] J --> G G --> K["Aftermarket Services 24.4B revenue 27% share"] K --> H

Five years of financials tell a story of a company that stumbled badly and then recovered sharply. Revenue climbed from $64.4 billion in 2021 to $88.6 billion in 2025, but the path was not smooth. Gross margin dipped from roughly 20% in 2022 to 17.5% in 2023, the year Pratt & Whitney discovered a rare defect in powder metal used to make certain engine parts. That defect forced thousands of PW1100G engines powering Airbus A320neo jets to be pulled for inspection, creating a massive one-time charge. The 2023 operating profit margin fell to just 5.2% as a result. By 2025, the company had worked through much of that damage. Operating profit margin recovered to 10.5%, and operating cash flow jumped to $10.6 billion, the strongest figure in the five-year window.

RTX Revenue 2021 to 2025 ($B)
2021
$64.4B
2022
$67.1B
2023
$68.9B
2024
$80.7B
2025
$88.6B
Revenue grew steadily except for the distortion caused by the Powder Metal Matter charge in 2023, which suppressed reported 2023 net sales.

Debt tells a more complicated story. Net debt rose from $23.6 billion in 2021 to a peak of $36.0 billion in 2023, driven in part by the costs of absorbing the Powder Metal Matter and prior merger-related obligations. By 2025 it had pulled back to $27.1 billion as cash generation improved. Free cash flow, which measures cash left over after the company has paid for its operations and capital spending, went from $4.9 billion in 2022 down to $4.5 billion in 2024, then recovered to $7.9 billion in 2025. That improvement matters because free cash flow is what actually funds debt repayment, dividends, and future investment.

$4.5B
Free Cash Flow 2024
$7.9B
Free Cash Flow 2025
Free cash flow nearly doubled in one year, reflecting the partial clearing of Powder Metal Matter costs and stronger operating performance across all three segments.

One of the most striking numbers in the filing is the order backlog. As of the end of 2025, RTX held $268 billion in firm orders already on the books, up from $218 billion just one year earlier. That figure represents work the company has already won but not yet delivered. The company expects to recognize about 25% of that backlog as revenue in the next twelve months. A backlog this large acts as a long runway of visibility, because even if new orders slowed tomorrow, the company would still have years of contracted work ahead.

$268B
Total order backlog as of December 31, 2025, up from $218B one year earlier
What is a fixed-price defense contract?
When RTX wins a defense contract at a fixed price, it agrees to deliver a system for a set dollar amount no matter what it actually costs to build. If materials get more expensive or engineering takes longer than planned, RTX absorbs the extra cost. That is why cost overruns on fixed-price programs can wipe out profit on an entire contract, even a large one.

The company faces five documented risk areas that are worth naming clearly. First, a large portion of revenue comes from the U.S. government. In 2025, direct U.S. government sales were $33.3 billion, or 38% of total revenue. If Congress cuts defense budgets, delays appropriations, or shifts priorities, that income can shrink fast. Second, the Powder Metal Matter is not fully resolved. Inspections of PW1100G engines are expected to continue through 2026, and the filing notes that similar problems could emerge in other engine models. Third, many defense contracts are fixed-price arrangements, meaning cost overruns come out of RTX's own pocket, not the customer's. Fourth, commercial aerospace sales rise and fall with airline health, and airlines are sensitive to recessions, fuel prices, and travel demand. Fifth, RTX depends on a global supply chain that includes rare earth metals and single-source foreign suppliers, and the company says it expects supply chain disruptions to continue.

2024
crisis
Legal Settlements: $1.15 Billion in Penalties
In 2024, RTX resolved two separate legal matters. A $200 million fine covered the illegal sharing of defense technology with foreign countries including China. A $950 million settlement covered bribery of foreign officials and overcharging the U.S. Defense Department on contracts including Patriot missile systems. The company is now under a three-year independent compliance monitor and a separate compliance officer overseeing export controls. A future finding that RTX violated the terms of either agreement could lead to criminal prosecution.

Those legal settlements matter beyond the dollar amounts. RTX is now operating under multiple deferred prosecution agreements, meaning federal prosecutors agreed to hold off on criminal charges as long as the company meets its compliance obligations for three years. If the Department of Justice decides RTX has violated any term of those agreements, prosecution could follow. That is an unusual condition for a company this size to be carrying.

What is a deferred prosecution agreement?
A deferred prosecution agreement is when prosecutors file criminal charges but agree to pause them, giving a company time to fix its behavior under supervision. If the company meets all the conditions, the charges are eventually dropped. If it breaks the rules again, prosecutors can immediately move forward with the original charges.

International sales are growing fast and now represent a larger share of revenue than U.S. government sales. In 2025, international sales reached $41.3 billion, or 47% of total revenue. That growth reflects strong global demand for air defense systems like Patriot, NASAMS, and AMRAAM, driven by the security environment in Europe and the Middle East. But it also creates exposure. China has already announced sanctions against parts of the Raytheon business over arms sales to Taiwan. The U.S. government can pause or revoke export licenses. And foreign governments can delay or withdraw their own approvals. Any of those outcomes could block a sale that is already in the backlog.

$41.3B
International sales in 2025, now 47% of total revenue and growing faster than domestic sales

The U.S. government also passed legislation in July 2025 that added $156.2 billion in supplemental defense spending through 2029, including $24.4 billion for the Golden Dome for America missile defense initiative and $25.4 billion for munitions and supply chain resiliency. RTX's 10-K states the company is well-positioned for both programs. Whether that positioning translates into actual contract awards, and how large those awards would be, is not yet determined.

RTX spent $2.8 billion of its own money on research and development in 2025, on top of $4.9 billion that customers funded directly. That is nearly $7.7 billion in total R&D, much of it on next-generation engines, hypersonics, and advanced radar systems that may not generate revenue for years.
The Bet
RTX's business logic only holds together if the aftermarket keeps expanding at the same pace as the installed base of engines and defense systems. Every GTF engine delivered today, and every Patriot battery sold abroad, is supposed to generate a long stream of spare parts and service revenue that is more profitable than the original sale. If airlines ground fleets, cancel service agreements, or find alternative suppliers for parts, that revenue stream shrinks. If defense customers slow procurement or shift to competitors, the future backlog does not replace what gets delivered today. The Powder Metal Matter showed how quickly one hardware problem can collapse the aftermarket economics for an entire engine family: inspections ground planes, parts revenue shifts to repairs at a lower margin, and the financial model that justified selling the original engine at thin margins stops working.
Open question
RTX enters 2026 with a record $268 billion backlog, recovering cash generation, and real exposure to rising global defense budgets. It also carries deferred prosecution agreements, an ongoing engine inspection program with costs running through at least 2026, a supply chain it admits will keep disrupting, and growing geopolitical risk around its international sales. The question a reader must weigh is whether the aftermarket engine on which this entire financial model rests, the long tail of parts and services revenue from engines and defense systems already in the field, is durable enough to absorb the next disruption, whatever form it takes, before it arrives.
[1] RTX Corporation 10-K filed 2026-02-06, Item 1 Business Description
[2] RTX Corporation 10-K filed 2026-02-06, Item 7 Management Discussion and Analysis
[3] RTX Corporation 10-K filed 2026-02-06, Item 1A Risk Factors
[4] RTX Corporation 10-K filed 2026-02-06, Note 17 Commitments and Contingencies
[5] RTX Corporation 10-K filed 2026-02-06, Note 20 Segment Financial Data
[6] XBRL financial data 2021 to 2025 as provided
Compiled · 10-K · FY2025
Products
$64.2B
Services
$24.4B
Products is the largest revenue source at 72.4% of total.
XBRL · Revenue segments · FY2025
Revenue by segment (3-year view)
Products
2023
$49.6B
2024
$59.6B
2025
$64.2B
Services
2023
$19.3B
2024
$21.1B
2025
$24.4B
Gross Margin Trend (5-year)
2021 2025
Gross margin moved from 19.4% (2021) to 20.1% (2025).
Operating Cash Flow (5-year)
2022
$7.2B
2023
$7.9B
2024
$7.2B
2025
$11B
Cash Conversion
1.57×
At 1.57×, the company converts more than $1 of cash for every $1 it earns, a sign that reported earnings are backed by real cash coming in the door.
XBRL · 10-K Financial Statements · FY2025
FY2025
$27B
↓ 19% year over year
FY2024
$33B
Net debt fell 19% year over year, the company is paying down more than it's taking on.
XBRL · Balance Sheet · 10-K · FY2025
Christopher T. Calio
Chief Executive Officer
$0
Gregory J. Hayes
Named Executive Officer
Compensation data not available
DEF 14A · Proxy Statement
Feb 23, 2026
Williams Dantaya M
EVP & Chief HR Officer
$2.58M
Feb 19, 2026
Mitchill Neil G. JR
CFO
$1.22M
Feb 19, 2026
Mitchill Neil G. JR
CFO
$1.30M
Feb 19, 2026
Mitchill Neil G. JR
CFO
$4.84M
Feb 19, 2026
Maharajh Ramsaran
General Counsel
$3.10M
Feb 19, 2026
Calio Christopher T.
Chairman, President and CEO
$0.21M
Feb 19, 2026
Calio Christopher T.
Chairman, President and CEO
$2.34M
Feb 19, 2026
Calio Christopher T.
Chairman, President and CEO
$10.40M
Feb 12, 2026
Eddy Shane G
President, P&W
$3.49M
Feb 13, 2026
DaSilva Kevin G
Senior VP and Treasurer
$0.04M
1 purchase and 46 sales by insiders over the past two years.
Form 4 · SEC filings · Last 24 months
Vanguard Group
9.3%
BlackRock
7.1%
State Street
6.9%
Capital Research Global
3.9%
JPMorgan Asset Mgmt
3.1%
Geode Capital Management
2.5%
Morgan Stanley
2.2%
Fidelity (FMR LLC)
1.0%
Vanguard Group is the largest institutional holder with 9.3% of shares outstanding.
13F filings
U.S. Government Defense Spending
A large part of this company's money comes from U.S. government defense contracts. If the government decides to spend less on defense, changes its priorities, or has budget problems like shutdowns, the company could lose significant revenue and profits. Congress controls this spending and makes decisions based on many unpredictable factors.
Pratt & Whitney Engine Powder Metal Defect
In 2023, Pratt & Whitney found that a rare problem in powder metal used to make certain engine parts requires inspecting thousands of PW1100 engines that power Airbus A320neo aircraft. This is causing many planes to be grounded, expensive repairs, and major cost impacts expected to continue through 2026. The company may face similar problems in other engine models.
U.S. Government Contract Performance Risks
The company's defense contracts are often fixed-price deals where the company keeps any extra costs if the project goes over budget. If the company miscalculates costs, encounters technical problems, or faces delays in getting parts and workers, profits can disappear or turn into losses. The government can also terminate contracts without warning, and the company may have to spend its own money on work that doesn't get reimbursed.
Commercial Aerospace Industry Cyclical Demand
The company's airplane engine and aerospace product sales depend heavily on airline health and spending. Airline demand is cyclical and swings based on travel demand, fuel prices, and economic conditions. Customer orders for future deliveries can be canceled or delayed if airlines face financial trouble.
Supply Chain Disruptions and Material Costs
The company depends on a global supply chain for raw materials like rare earth metals, microelectronics, and other components. Recent disruptions from geopolitical conflicts, sanctions, inflation, and shipping problems have caused delays and higher costs. The company expects these problems to continue and may face further delays on critical parts.
10-K Item 1A · Risk Factors
Cash vs earnings
AR growth
Inventory
Share dilution
Debt trend
·
One-time charges
Goodwill
·
Customer conc.
Goodwill and intangibles are 50% of total assets — the business depends on past acquisitions delivering returns.
10-K · XBRL · Computed signals